Workman Law Blog

Trial Courts Cannot Strike PAGA Claims On Manageability Grounds

Today, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. In the much anticipated decision, the Court held that trial courts cannot strike claims brought under California's Private Attorneys General… Read More

Read More
Categories: Case News

The NLRB Rejects a Trump-Era Definition of "Employee"

On June 13, 2023, in The Atlanta Opera, Inc. and Make-Up Artists and Hair Stylists Union, Local 798, IATSE, Case 10-RC-276292, the National Labor Relations Board ("the Board") revisited its approach to assessing whether workers are employ… Read More

Read More
Categories: Case News

The Ninth Circuits Narrowly Construes Labor Code section 2810.3, Affirming a Win for Strawberry Marketers

The question in Morales-Garcia v. Better Produce, Inc., et al, __ F. 4th __, 2023 WL 3749314, *3 (2023), was whether strawberry Marketers, who entered into yearly marketing and sublease agreements with Growers, which specified that the la… Read More

Read More
Categories: Case News

Even Though the Ninth Circuit Held that Time Spent Booting Up Computers is Compensable, the De Minimis Rule Still Doomed the FLSA Claims

In Cedena v. Customer Connexx LLC, 51 F.4th 831 (2022), reversing the district court's summary judgment ruling, the Ninth Circuit held that the time spent by call center workers booting up their computers and logging into the time system… Read More

Read More
Categories: Case News

California Supreme Court Confirms The Broad Whistleblower Protections in Labor Code section 1102.5

At least since 2013, California Labor Code section 1102.5 has prohibited employers from retaliating against employees for "disclosing information" concerning suspected violations of law, either internally or to government or law enforcement agenci… Read More

Read More
Categories: Case News

The California Courts of Appeal Reject the Standing Analysis in Viking River Cruises

The California Courts of Appeal uniformly hold that, a plaintiff, whose individual PAGA claims have been sent to arbitration following the United States Supreme Court's decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 142 S. Ct. 1906, 1… Read More

Read More
Categories: Case News

The Supreme Court Of The United States Hands Defendants A Setback In Their Removal Quests: Third-Party Defendants Asserting Counterclaims Cannot Remove Counterclaims To Federal Court. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., v. Jackson, 2019 WL 2257158 (U.S. May 28, 2019)

SUMMARY:

The Supreme Court of the United States held that the general removal statute, 28 U.S.C. §1441, and the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C §1453, does not allow third-party counterclaim def… Read More

Read More

Second District Court of Appeal’s Decision in Ward v. Tilly’s Inc., 31 Cal. App. 5th 1167 (February 4, 2019), Defines “Report For Work” Within Wage Order 7 and Extends The Reporting Time Pay Requirement’s Reach To “Call-In” Shifts For Mercantile Workers

SUMMARY:

The California Second District Court of Appeal reversed a trial court’s decision in favor of the employer which held that an employee must physically appear at the workplace to “report to work.” The Court i… Read More

Read More

Legislative Update

Assembly Member Gonzalez Fletcher sponsored AB 3080, that was co-sponsored by the AFL-CIO and the Screen Actors Guild, which prohibits employers from requiring, as a condition of employment, employees to waive any “right, forum, or procedure” for… Read More
Read More

PAGA STANDING CLARIFIED

In Huff v. Securitas Services USA, Inc., 2018 Cal. App. LEXIS 474 (decided May 23, 2018), the Court of Appeal held that an employee bringing a claim pursuant to the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“the PAGA”) need only… Read More

Read More
Categories: Case News