Settled and Closed – Vega v. Sensient

Plaintiff Vega contended Sensient failed to provide a second meal period for work shifts in excess of 10 hours per day. Plaintiff contended Sensient also employs production workers paid on an hourly basis whom it periodically schedules to work more than 10 hours per day. Plaintiff also contended Sensient did not provide any California hourly employee a second meal period when such employee worked more than 10 hours per day, nor did Sensient record any such meal periods.

The Court granted final approval of a class settlement on March 18, 2014 and the case is now closed.

Final Approval Order